Categories

Archive

The Marketing Eye Blog << Blog Home

That was the wonder of Woolworths

Posted Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008 by Neil Edwards

The administrator’s announcement of the closure of all 807 Woolworths’ stores shows that no value could be realised from the business as a going concern. The question remains whether there is any value in the brand and if anybody will be willing to pay a price for it.

In our brand value blog last month we argued the worth of the Ryanair brand and made the case for significant value by using the metrics of awareness; understanding; preference and stretch: this despite the airlines apparent unpopularity with many.

When applied to Woolworths we get a very different result and some important pointers.

Awareness
Woolworths is a highly visible brand. Brand awareness is invariably a positive attribute as it drives business through the comfort of familiarity and apathy in the search process. Somebody should be able to put this awareness to positive use.

Understanding
Understanding is where the Woolworths’ brand starts to unravel. People lost sight of what Woolworths was and stood for. The shops were confused, a hotchpotch of crammed aisles offering everything from pick-n-mix sweets to garden furniture. The unifying element was price and when cost leadership is your sole basis of competition, there is only one direction for those prices to go - down. A major re-positioning exercise would be required by any acquirer.

Preference
There was a time when Woolworths was a natural choice for many, offering as it did an Aladdin’s cave of goods, conveniently located at fair prices.

In its dying days there was nothing the stores offered that couldn’t be acquired in a more satisfying way elsewhere. There was no positive reason to choose Woolworths other than it was there. Any benefit of convenience was rapidly eroded by the shift to out-of-town locations and the Internet.

Stretch
To stretch the brand into new markets would require getting the preceding factors right, something that proved beyond the ability of the previous management. A new management team, however able, would surely ask itself, why it should invest in a broken brand for a new market when it can focus its resources on building something new.

So, any value beyond the awareness seems to have been destroyed. What lessons are available from this demise?

Woolworths started as one of the original penny bazaars when such things were seen as a marvel of commerce. But times change and Woolworths didn’t. As we warned our children away from the excesses of sugar and the music industry switched to downloads, Woolworths stubbornly kept its front of house offer as sweets and CD’s. If the strategy was for high-spending parents to be dragged in by low-spending children, it clearly didn’t work.

The brand lacked any clarity in its basis of competition. There are essentially three choices: focus, differentiation and cost leadership. Woolworths had no focus, try as it did to offer all things to all people. There was no point of difference and cost leadership is only sustainable by the market leader and there can’t be a leader in an undefined market.

The greatest tragedy of all was that Woolworths stopped caring for itself. In the final years, the stores were a mess and the staff totally disengaged. Woolworths went from having a great brand to no brand at all in less than 10 years because it lost sight of what it had and failed to evolve a new space for itself in a changing market. A brand is defined by passion and loyalty and seemingly the staff noticed the problems before the management. If there is no passion and loyalty in your staff then you can hardly expect it of your customers.

A brand that falls out of love with itself is no longer a brand at all.


Posted Tuesday, December 23rd, 2008 by Neil Edwards


Other Articles In This Category

  • Beyond No Logo

    This post is co-authored with Jo Allen, Creative Director with The Marketing Eye.Several years have passed since ‘No Logo’, Naomi Klein’s seminal backlash against... read more
    13th of September 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Putting the star and bucks back in Starbucks - Starbucks trial brand strategy

    Coffee is a regular topic of conversation in The Marketing Eye office. Normally it’s an argument about whose turn it is to make the next one, but now, for a short... read more
    2nd of August 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Banking on a brand

    Santander has announced that it is to rebrand all of its UK operations.Bradford & Bingley, Abbey and Alliance & Leicester are to disappear from our High... read more
    4th of June 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • An innocent (and logical) decision

    Last week we learned that Innocent Drinks has agreed to sell a 20% stake in the business to Coca-Cola for £30m.The news has parallels with the sale of Ben... read more
    18th of April 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Making brand values valuable

    Brand values originated as a concept somewhere in the 1990’s when the understanding of branding evolved from being simply an exercise in corporate identity to it... read more
    14th of March 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Brands without chains

    Jo and I had lunch today with Erika Uffindell, brand guru and founder of leading brand agency, Uffindellwest.While we were speaking, I couldn't help wonder if it is... read more
    6th of March 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Irrational marketing for rational customers won't work

    Seth Godin is a well respected blogger and talks good sense on a variety of marketing related issues. In his post on The rational marketer (and the irrational... read more
    19th of February 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Woolworths re-launch

    We wake up this morning, not only to snow, but to news that Woolworths is to be re-launched as an online business.As we predicted in our post in December, somebody... read more
    2nd of February 2009 by Neil Edwards

  • Brand value

    I was at a talk yesterday, given by Paul Fifield, visiting professor in Marketing Strategy at Southampton University. Paul’s style is witty and down to earth, which... read more
    13th of November 2008 by Neil Edwards

 


 

On this site

Contact Us